§

Corson & Gruman Co.

278 N.L.R.B. 329 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Corson & Gruman Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Southport Pet., Co. v. N.L.R.B

    315 U.S. 100 (1942)   Cited 187 times
    Ruling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order

  2. Schauffler v. L. 1291, Int'l Longshoremen's

    292 F.2d 182 (3d Cir. 1961)   Cited 107 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "sporadic refusals" to work are not enough to clearly and convincingly show that union disobeyed court order

  3. San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Associated General Contractors

    633 F.2d 766 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 33 times

    No. 79-7484. Argued and Submitted September 9, 1980. Decided October 16, 1980. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1980. Jerrold J. Wohlgemuth, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James P. Watson, Los Angeles, Cal. (on brief), for respondent. Victor J. Van Bourg, Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg Roger, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior District Judge. Of the District of

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Scott Printing Corp.

    612 F.2d 783 (3d Cir. 1979)   Cited 18 times
    In Scott Printing Corp., for example, the employer, Scott Printing, informed the union that it would have to sell or shut down its composing room because it could not compete with non-union composition.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Leonard B. Hebert, Jr. Co.

    696 F.2d 1120 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that the union "has the initial burden of showing relevancy" where it alleges that the employer is using "double breasted operations" to evade contractual obligations with the union, i.e., the employer is allegedly operating two corporations, one hiring strictly union employees, and the other, nonunion employees, to compete for both union and nonunion work

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Realty Maintenance, Inc.

    723 F.2d 746 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 3 times
    Requiring employer to provide information about employer's business relationships with related companies so that union could determine whether employer was violating collective bargaining agreement by secretly cutting wages and subcontracting out work

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Ohio Power Co.

    531 F.2d 1381 (6th Cir. 1976)   Cited 7 times

    No. 75-1661. April 22, 1976. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Bert Bisgyer, Washington, D.C., Bernard Levine, Director, Region 8, N.L.R.B., Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. John A. McGuinn, Patterson, Belknap, Farmer Shibley, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before EDWARDS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges, and HOGAN, Chief District Judge. The Honorable Timothy S. Hogan, Chief District Judge, for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. ORDER The National Labor

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. M.P. Bldg. Corp.

    411 F.2d 567 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 4 times

    No. 26473. May 14, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Clifford Potter, Director, Region 23, Houston, Tex., Ronald R. Helveston, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Michael N. Sohn, Burton L. Raimi, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Hugh G. Freeland, Lavon L. Jones, Beaumont, Tex., for respondents. Before BELL and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and CHOATE, Senior District Judge. PER CURIAM: This case is before the Court