§

Corson And Gruman Co.

284 N.L.R.B. 1316 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Corson And Gruman Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 233 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

  2. Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    454 U.S. 404 (1982)   Cited 116 times
    Holding that courts must not "substitute [their] judgment for those of the Board with respect to the issues that Congress intended the Board should resolve"

  3. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  4. Capitol-Husting Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    671 F.2d 237 (7th Cir. 1982)   Cited 50 times
    Finding that the "Union acted reasonably in relying" on Capitol-Husting's offer to match financial package offered by rival company that the Union was also negotiating with, such that Capitol-Husting was acting in bad faith to claim that Union's failure to expressly accept this offer nullified its obligation to abide by the contract

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Clement Brothers Company

    407 F.2d 1027 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 27 times

    No. 25319. February 12, 1969. Rehearing Denied July 17, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, John I. Taylor, Michael N. Sohn, Linda Sher, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harry L. Griffin, Jr., Overton A. Currie, William T. Wood, Smith, Currie Hancock, Atlanta, Ga., for Clement Brothers Co., Inc., Mark G. Kaplan, Boston, Mass., Angoff, Goldman, Manning Pyle, Boston, Mass., for International Union

  6. Seattle Auto Glass v. N.L.R.B

    669 F.2d 1332 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 3 times
    In Seattle Auto Glass v. NLRB, 669 F.2d at 1332, for instance, we held that when the union entered a separate permanent agreement with one member of a multi-employer unit, whose employees constituted thirty percent of those employed by the unit, that action "`effectively fragmented and destroyed the integrity of the bargaining unit.'"

  7. Tobey Fine Papers of Kan. City v. N.L.R.B

    659 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1981)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 79-1840, 79-1872 and 79-2000. Submitted October 13, 1980. Decided April 20, 1981. Timothy L. Stalnaker, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner, Tobey Fine Papers of Kansas City, Division of Distribix, Inc.; Lewis, Rice, Tucker, Allen Chubb, St. Louis, Mo., of counsel. Larry W. Joye, Kansas City, Mo., for intervenor-respondent Teamsters Local No. 955. William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Imperial Outdoor Advertising

    470 F.2d 484 (8th Cir. 1972)   Cited 2 times

    No. 72-1140. Submitted October 20, 1972. Decided December 8, 1972. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Richard L. Berkheimer, Lincoln, Neb., for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before HEANEY and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE, District Judge. Sitting by designation, District of South Dakota. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for the enforcement of its order issued against Imperial Outdoor Advertising

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Porter County Farm Bureau Coop

    314 F.2d 133 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 8 times

    No. 13708 February 14, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Jules H. Gordon, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Daniel F. Kelly and Allen W. Teagle, Hammond, Ind., Tinkham, Beckman, Kelly Singleton, Hammond Ind., of counsel, for respondent, Porter County Farm Bureau Co-operative Ass'n, Inc. Before KNOCH, CASTLE and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges. KNOCH, Circuit Judge. This case

  10. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,873 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions