§
Coronet Foods

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 270 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  4. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Blake Const. Co., Inc.

    663 F.2d 272 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that petitioner's exception "to the ALJ's conclusions of law as `based on misstatements of facts, mistaken premises, suppositions, hearsay, and misapplication of law'" sufficiently preserved a due process issue

  7. Alexander Dawson, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    586 F.2d 1300 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 40 times
    Holding "the content of a document, when considered with the circumstances surrounding its discovery, is an adequate basis for [its authentication]"

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ayer Lar Sanitarium

    436 F.2d 45 (9th Cir. 1970)   Cited 39 times
    In NLRB v. Ayer Lar Sanitarium, supra, 436 F.2d at 50, we said that the "test is whether the business reason or the... union activity is the moving cause behind the discharge.

  9. General Teamsters Allied Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    427 F.2d 582 (D.C. Cir. 1970)   Cited 13 times
    Timing of wage increase coupled with widespread publication of it

  10. T.I.M.E. — DC, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    504 F.2d 294 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 73-2531, 73-2952. November 15, 1974. R. Ian Hunter, Detroit, Mich., A. Read Cone, Bloomfield Hills, Mich., for T.I.M.E. Dominick Tocci, Albany, N. Y., for Local No. 294. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Majorie J. Gofreed, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Thomas W. Seeler, Regional Director, N.L.R.B., Albany, N. Y., for N.L.R.B. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before BELL, GOLDBERG and CLARK, Circuit Judges. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: Kenneth Smith, a long distance