§

CORAL HARBOR REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTTER

22-CA-167738 (N.L.R.B. Jul. 13, 2017)
CORAL HARBOR REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTTER

10 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 371 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 480 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  4. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 181 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit

  5. Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO

    417 U.S. 249 (1974)   Cited 367 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America

    511 U.S. 571 (1994)   Cited 97 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Board's test is inconsistent with both the statutory language and th[e] Court's precedents"

  7. Ahrens Aircraft, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    703 F.2d 23 (1st Cir. 1983)   Cited 23 times

    No. 82-1079. Argued February 10, 1983. Decided March 28, 1983. Lawrence Odell, Patrick Duffy O'Neill, and Colorado, Martinez, Odell, Calabria Sierra, Hato Rey, P.R., on brief, for petitioner. Lawrence E. Blatnik, Washington, D.C., with whom William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, W. Christian Schumann and Helen L. Morgan, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for

  8. Coastal Derby Refining Co. v. N.L.R.B

    915 F.2d 1448 (10th Cir. 1990)   Cited 6 times
    In Coastal Derby Refining Co. v. NLRB, 915 F.2d 1448 (10th Cir. 1990), we held that when there has been a hiatus between the closing of an enterprise and its reopening, "[t]he relevant inquiry is whether the hiatus was of such length as to call into question the likelihood that former... employees viewed their current jobs as essentially unchanged."

  9. Oil, Chemical Atomic Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    445 F.2d 237 (D.C. Cir. 1971)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 23295, 23300, 23750, 23751. Argued November 3, 1970. Decided May 27, 1971. Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., for petitioner in Nos. 23,295 and 23,300. Mr. Marvin J. Martin, with whom Mr. W. Stanley Churchill, Wichita, Kan., was on the brief, for petitioner in Nos. 23,750 and 23,751 and intervenor in Nos. 23,295 and 23,300. Mr. Joseph E. Mayer, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, for respondent. Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel

  10. West Penn Power Company v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.2d 993 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times
    Involving power transmission and distribution supervisors that prioritized repairs and de-energized lines for repair