Coppus Engineering Corp.

12 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.
385 U.S. 421 (1967) Cited 117 times
Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”
Timken Roller Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B
325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963) Cited 56 times
In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.
Leeds Northrup Company v. N.L.R.B
391 F.2d 874 (3d Cir. 1968) Cited 31 times
In Leeds Northrup Co. v. NLRB, 391 F.2d 874 (3rd Cir. 1968), the Third Circuit enforced the Board's order requiring the company to grant backpay to union employees based on a prior compensation formula where the company had unilaterally altered the formula in violation of its duty to bargain.
General Electric Company v. N.L.R.B
414 F.2d 918 (4th Cir. 1969) Cited 17 times
Holding that employer committed an unfair labor practice by failing to disclose results of survey of wages paid by other employers in the area in response to request by union
Weltronic Company v. N.L.R.B
419 F.2d 1120 (6th Cir. 1969) Cited 14 times
In Weltronic we indulged the presumption that the Board's unstated reason for denying the union's motion to reopen was because the company had already filed in this Court its petition for review of the Board's order.
N.L.R.B. v. SCAM INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
394 F.2d 884 (7th Cir. 1968) Cited 14 times
No. 16599. May 15, 1968. Rehearing Denied June 26, 1968. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Burton L. Raimi, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, for petitioner. George L. Plumb, Chicago, Ill., Peer Pedersen, Chicago, Ill., for respondent; Pedersen Houpt, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. Before KNOCH, Senior Circuit Judge, and CASTLE and KILEY, Circuit Judges. CASTLE, Circuit Judge. This case
Armstrong Cork Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954) Cited 27 times
In Armstrong Cork Co. v. NLRB, 211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954), an employer announced to an assembly of workers shortly after a representation election that he intended to remove a "pledge" which the Company had posted on the bulletin board setting forth employees' rights.
Wald Manufacturing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
426 F.2d 1328 (6th Cir. 1970) Cited 8 times
Nos. 19652, 19823. June 3, 1970. Frank H. Stewart, Cincinnati, Ohio, Timothy J. Curtin, Thorley C. Mills, Jr., Taft, Stettinius Hollister, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief, for Wald Manufacturing Co. Nancy M. Sherman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allen H. Feldman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief, for National Labor Relations Board. Before CELEBREZZE, McCREE and
Unit Drop Forge Div. Eaton, Yale v. N.L.R.B
412 F.2d 108 (7th Cir. 1969) Cited 6 times
No. 16942. June 13, 1969. Frank C. Heath, Stuart O.H. Merz, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner, Jones, Day, Cockley Reavis, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel. Stanley Lubin, Stephen I. Schlossberg, Detroit, Mich., for intervenor. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Herbert Fishgold, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Senior Circuit Judge, FAIRCHILD and KERNER, Circuit

Coppus Engineering Corp.

12 Cited authorities

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.

In Leeds Northrup Co. v. NLRB, 391 F.2d 874 (3rd Cir. 1968), the Third Circuit enforced the Board's order requiring the company to grant backpay to union employees based on a prior compensation formula where the company had unilaterally altered the formula in violation of its duty to bargain.

Holding that employer committed an unfair labor practice by failing to disclose results of survey of wages paid by other employers in the area in response to request by union

In Weltronic we indulged the presumption that the Board's unstated reason for denying the union's motion to reopen was because the company had already filed in this Court its petition for review of the Board's order.

In Armstrong Cork Co. v. NLRB, 211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954), an employer announced to an assembly of workers shortly after a representation election that he intended to remove a "pledge" which the Company had posted on the bulletin board setting forth employees' rights.