Copeland Oil Co., Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Flomatic Corporation

    347 F.2d 74 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 50 times
    In NLRB v. Flomatic Corp., 347 F.2d 74, 76-77 (2 Cir. 1965), this court held that various promises of benefits and an invitation to deal directly with the company violated § 8(a)(1).
  2. Irving Air Chute Company v. N.L.R.B

    350 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times
    In Irving Air Chute Co. v. N.L.R.B., 2 Cir., 350 F.2d 176, 182, the Court in allowing enforcement of the Board's order cited many cases for the proposition, "`It is for the Board not the courts to determine how the effect of prior unfair labor practices may be expunged'."
  3. Colson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 128 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 35 times
    Finding that a repudiation three weeks after unlawful conduct was inadequate
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Gorbea, Perez Morell, S. en C

    328 F.2d 679 (1st Cir. 1964)   Cited 17 times

    No. 5918. March 6, 1964. Norton J. Come, Washington, D.C., Atty., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Laurence Gold, Washington, D.C., Atty., were on the brief, for petitioner. Jaime Pieras, Jr., San Juan, P.R., with whom Pieras Martin, San Juan, P.R., was on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and MARIS and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. Sitting by designation. ALDRICH, Circuit Judge. In N.L.R.B

  5. Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    345 F.2d 264 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 264, 265, Dockets 29097, 29131. Argued February 15, 1965. Decided May 11, 1965. Jacob Sheinkman, Joel Field, New York City, for Amalgamated Clothing Workers. Michael N. Sohn, Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Washington, D.C., Atty.), for National Labor Relations Board. Denetrio Fernandez, Luis E. Garcia Benitez, San Juan, P.R., for Edro Corp. and Anasco Gloves

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Firedoor Corporation of America

    291 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 17 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Firedoor Corp. of America, 2 Cir., 291 F.2d 328, 331, the rule under discussion is stated, "Interrogation of employees is legal, when the questioning is not accompanied by any explicit threats, cf. N.L.R.B. v. Beaner [Beaver] Meadow Creamery, 3 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 247, if under all the circumstances coercion is not implicit in the questioning.
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Larry Faul Oldsmobile Co.

    316 F.2d 595 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 11 times
    In Faul, a manager's statement that "he might as well as throw the place up for grabs" was made in response to a direct question as to the future of the company by an employee who had already been discharged. Under those circumstances, the court determined that the statement could not in any sense be interpreted as a threat against unionization to current employees.