§
Cooper's Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. P. Lorillard Co.

    314 U.S. 512 (1942)   Cited 76 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 71. Argued December 18, 19, 1941. Decided January 5, 1942. Whether an employer should be required to bargain with a union previously selected as employees' bargaining representative or, in view of lapse of time and changed conditions, a new election should be held is a question for decision by the Board and not by the Circuit Court of Appeals. P. 513. 117 F.2d 921, reversed. CERTIORARI, 313 U.S. 557, to review a judgment entered

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wiltse

    188 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 27 times

    No. 11128. Decided March 23, 1951. As Amended on Rehearing June 1, 1951. Duane Beeson, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Bernard Dunau, and Duane Beeson, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. George Meader, Washington, D.C. (George Meader, Washington, D.C., John S. Dobson, Ann Arbor, Mich., on the brief), for respondent. Before SIMONS, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board filed its petition

  4. Law v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    192 F.2d 236 (10th Cir. 1951)   Cited 10 times

    No. 4224. October 25, 1951. R.C. Garland, Las Cruces, N.M. (Garland Sanders, Las Cruces, N.M., on the brief), for petitioners. Arnold Ordman, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Arnold Ordman, Atty., NLRB, all of Washington, D.C., and Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., NLRB, Takoma Park, Md., on the brief), for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Michalik

    201 F.2d 48 (6th Cir. 1952)   Cited 3 times

    No. 11537. December 19, 1952. George J. Bott, A. Norman Somers and Mary Williamson, Washington, D.C., and Harry N. Casselman, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Davidow Davidow, Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Before MARTIN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the Board's findings that respondent violated Section 8(a)(1,

  6. National Labor Relations Bd. v. I.F. Sales Co.

    188 F.2d 931 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 3 times

    No. 11216. March 23, 1951. George J. Bott, Washington, D.C., John A. Hull. Jr., and Philip Fusco, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. R.F. Vandemark and R.W. Vandemark, Elyria, Ohio, R.W. Vandemark, Elyria, Ohio, for respondent. Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The above cause coming on to be heard on the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel; and it appearing that the findings of the National Labor Relations Board that employee