§

Controlled Energy Systems

331 N.L.R.B. 251 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Controlled Energy Systems

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  4. Foods v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    82 F.3d 1113 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the employer's statement to the striking employees that it had hired permanent replacements was truthful when made

  5. N.L.R.B. v. PRINEVILLE STUD CO

    578 F.2d 1292 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 5 times

    No. 77-1773. June 23, 1978. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing July 27, 1978. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., for N.L.R.B. Lester V. Smith, Jr. (argued), of Bullard, Korshoj Smith, Portland, Or., for Prineville Stud Co. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge. The Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon. sitting

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second