§

Continental Intermodal Group - Trucking LLC

IPR2019-01393 (P.T.A.B. Jul. 9, 2020)
Continental Intermodal Group - Trucking LLC

6 Cited authorities

  1. SAS Inst. Inc. v. Iancu

    138 S. Ct. 1348 (2018)   Cited 267 times   140 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the word "any" carries "an expansive meaning"

  2. In re Gartside

    203 F.3d 1305 (Fed. Cir. 2000)   Cited 525 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that factual determinations underlying an obviousness rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are reviewed for substantial evidence

  3. Seisakusho v. U.S.

    529 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2008)   Cited 35 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that Commerce's power to reconsider a determination is “even more fundamental when ... it is exercised to protect the integrity of its own proceedings from fraud”

  4. GTNX, Inc. v. INTTRA, Inc.

    789 F.3d 1309 (Fed. Cir. 2015)   Cited 19 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding the APA "is not a jurisdiction-conferring statute"

  5. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 381 times   636 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"

  6. Section 42.71 - Decision on petitions or motions

    37 C.F.R. § 42.71   Cited 22 times   44 Legal Analyses

    (a)Order of consideration. The Board may take up petitions or motions for decisions in any order, may grant, deny, or dismiss any petition or motion, and may enter any appropriate order. (b)Interlocutory decisions. A decision on a motion without a judgment is not final for the purposes of judicial review. If a decision is not a panel decision, the party may request that a panel rehear the decision. When rehearing a non-panel decision, a panel will review the decision for an abuse of discretion. A