Contemporary Cars. Inc. d/b/a Mercedes Benz of Orlando and Auto Nation, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 142 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Al Bryant, Inc.

    711 F.2d 543 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 62 times
    Finding that "the frequent interchange of craftsman" between the two companies is "substantial evidence to support" centralized labor relations control
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Pacific Southwest Airlines

    550 F.2d 1148 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 24 times

    No. 75-1903. February 8, 1977. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Meserve, Mumper Hughes, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before CHOY and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and RICHEY, District Judge. The Honorable Mary Anne Richey, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. OPINION CHOY, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board, in accordance with § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Beverage-Air Company

    402 F.2d 411 (4th Cir. 1968)   Cited 5 times

    No. 11961. Argued April 4, 1968. Decided September 27, 1968. Fred R. Kimmel, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief) for petitioner. Ernest W. Machen, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on brief) for respondent. Morgan C. Stanford, Atlanta, Ga. (Adair, Goldthwaite, Stanford Daniel, Atlanta, Ga., Irving Abramson, Gen. Counsel