§

Container Transit

281 N.L.R.B. 1039 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Container Transit

16 Cited authorities

  1. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 501 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 480 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO

    417 U.S. 249 (1974)   Cited 368 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees

  4. Southport Pet., Co. v. N.L.R.B

    315 U.S. 100 (1942)   Cited 187 times
    Ruling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order

  5. Local 777, Democratic U. Org. Com v. N.L.R.B

    603 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding "any great amount of deference" "inappropriate" "because of the Board's history of vacillation"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Jeffries Lithograph Co.

    752 F.2d 459 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 49 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding continuity where successor retained essentially same workforce in same plant doing same jobs under same supervisor with some of the same equipment, providing similar services

  7. Premium Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    709 F.2d 623 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 32 times
    Holding that employees' requests for withdrawal cards, even if such requests indicated that the employees no longer wished to be members of the union, did “not necessarily indicate that [they] no longer wish to be represented by it”

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Hudson River Aggregates

    639 F.2d 865 (2d Cir. 1981)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that the NLRB's bargaining unit determinations are rarely to be disturbed unless arbitrary, unreasonable, or not supported by substantial evidence.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Band-Age, Inc.

    534 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1976)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that the diminution in an organization's size, and in the range of its products, does not preclude a finding of successorship

  10. United Dairy Farmers Co-op. Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    633 F.2d 1054 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 20 times

    Nos. 79-1807, 79-1883. Argued May 23, 1980. Decided October 30, 1980. John Regis Valaw, James J. Flaherty (argued), Pittsburgh, Pa., Stephen J. Cabot, Pechner, Dorfman, Wolffe, Rounick Cabot, Philadelphia, Pa., for United Dairy Farmers Cooperative Association. Hugh J. Beins, Jonathan G. Axelrod (argued), Bethesda, Md., Louis B. Kushner, Rothman, Gordon, Foreman, Groudine, P. A., Pittsburgh, Pa., for Teamsters Local Union No. 205. Richard B. Bader (argued), Atty., William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel