Construction & General Laborers'

Teamsters Local v. Labor Board
365 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 174 times
Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
Intnl. U., Ele., R. M. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B
307 F.2d 679 (D.C. Cir. 1962) Cited 24 times
Nos. 16273 and 16301. Argued January 4, 1962. Decided June 7, 1962. Petition for Rehearing Denied in No. 16,273 July 5, 1962. Certiorari Denied December 10, 1962. See 83 S.Ct. 307. Mr. David S. Davidson, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Benjamin C. Sigal, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 16273. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General
Int'l Union of Operating Engr. v. N.L.R.B
496 F.2d 1308 (6th Cir. 1974) Cited 6 times
No. 73-1760. Argued January 29, 1974. Decided May 31, 1974. Louis S. Belkin, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner; Alan S. Belkin, Belkin Belkin, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief. Stuart Rosenblum, N.L.R.B., for respondent; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Robert A. Giannasi, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David Miller, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Petition for review from the National