§

Consolidated Printers

305 N.L.R.B. 1061 (N.L.R.B. 1992)
Consolidated Printers

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Local 512, Warehouse & Office Workers' Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    795 F.2d 705 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 36 times
    In Local 512 v. NLRB ("Felbro"), 795 F.2d 705, 722 (9th Cir. 1986), the Ninth Circuit reached this holding after observing that " Sure-Tan gave no indication that it was overruling a significant line of precedent that disregards a discriminatee's legal status, as opposed to availability to work, in determining his or her eligibility for back pay."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Carbonex Coal Co.

    679 F.2d 200 (10th Cir. 1982)   Cited 12 times

    No. 80-1739. May 25, 1982. William Bernstein, Washington, D.C. (William Wachter, Washington, D.C., Atty., of counsel: William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Alex V. Barbour, Chicago, Ill. (Edward B. Miller, Chicago, Ill., Atty., of counsel: Pope, Ballard, Shepard Fowle, Chicago, Ill., with him on

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. U.S. Gypsum Co.

    206 F.2d 410 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 11 times

    No. 14048. August 6, 1953. Rehearing Denied August 31, 1953. Owsley Vose, Atty., NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Marshall J. Seidman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harold D. Burgess and Charles M. Price, Chicago, Ill. (MacLeish, Spray, Price Underwood, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and RIVES, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court on petition of the