§

Consolidated Freightways Corp.

288 N.L.R.B. 1252 (N.L.R.B. 1988)
Consolidated Freightways Corp.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

    465 U.S. 822 (1984)   Cited 206 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection

  4. Harmonay Inc. v. Binks Mfg. Co.

    762 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1985)   Cited 61 times
    Adopting Restatement (Second) Conflicts of Law § 187

  5. Birch Run Welding Fabricating, v. N.L.R.B

    761 F.2d 1175 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 35 times
    Ordering general layoffs to discourage or retaliate against union activity is unlawful discrimination, even though some employees opposed to the union were laid-off as well

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Health Care Logistics, Inc.

    784 F.2d 232 (6th Cir. 1986)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that employer committed unfair labor practice by discharging two employees engaged in protected union activity but did not engage in unfair employment practice when it discharged similarly active employee who performed poorly during his probationary period

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ryder/P.I.E. Nationwide, Inc.

    810 F.2d 502 (5th Cir. 1987)   Cited 10 times
    Finding that the Board's refusal to defer to arbitrator was proper in case where arbitrator considered whether discharge was proper under the collective bargaining agreement and the whereas Board dealt with the issue of whether employee was discharged for grievance filing activity

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Vought Corp.—MLRS Systems Division

    788 F.2d 1378 (8th Cir. 1986)   Cited 9 times

    No. 85-1271. Submitted November 15, 1985. Decided April 21, 1986. John B. Shepard, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Jesse Gill, of the N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Petition from National Labor Relations Board. Before HEANEY, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order which found that Vought Corporation — MLRS Systems Division (the Company) committed several violations of sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3)

  9. Champion Parts Rebuilders, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    717 F.2d 845 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 10 times
    Finding that employer violated § 8 by discharging employee in retaliation for filing grievances

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Edgar Spring, Inc.

    800 F.2d 595 (6th Cir. 1986)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 85-5858, 85-5938. Argued June 13, 1986. Decided September 4, 1986. James A. Rydzel (argued), Barbara J. Leukart, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Sandra S. Elligers, Kenneth Hipp, Ellen O. Broadman (argued), Frederick Calatrello, Director, Region 8, NLRB, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MARTIN and GUY, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM