§

Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Consolidated Communications of Texas Company

366 NLRB No. 172 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Consolidated Communications of Texas Company

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Holsum de Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    456 F.3d 265 (1st Cir. 2006)   Cited 3 times
    Finding substantial evidence of knowledge of union activities conducted in plain view in an open parking lot where the activities "could very well have been observed by any number of supervisors and managers"

  4. CGLM Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    280 F. App'x 366 (5th Cir. 2008)

    No. 07-60685. June 3, 2008. Donald C. Douglas, Jr., Middleberg, Riddle Gianna, New Orleans, LA, for Petitioner-Cross-Respondent. James G. Paulsen, National Labor Relations Board, Region 15, New Orleans, LA, Linda Jill Dreeben, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Cross-Petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (15-CA-17889). Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:[fn*]

  5. Midstate Tel. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    706 F.2d 401 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 10 times
    Applying special circumstances approach to rule banning a particular type of T-shirt

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Blades Manufacturing Corporation

    344 F.2d 998 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 25 times
    In Blades the court nullified a second election (choosing the union) within a year of a valid election rejecting the union.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mac Smith Garment

    219 F.2d 469 (5th Cir. 1955)

    No. 14946. February 9, 1955. Rehearing Denied March 7, 1955. Charles M. Paschal, Chief Law Officer, New Orleans, La., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Robert E. Miller, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. David Cottrell, Jr., Eaton Cottrell, Gulfport, Miss., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, BORAH, Circuit Judge, and DAWKINS, District

  8. Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.

    29 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 3,303 times   97 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees the right to engage in or refrain from engaging in union activity