§

Consolidated Communications d/b/a Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company

360 N.L.R.B. 1284 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
Consolidated Communications d/b/a Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company

2 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Augusta Bakery Corp.

    957 F.2d 1467 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 45 times
    Holding that the replacements were temporary because, although the replacements were told that "if they worked out and did their job, they had a job," the testimony of the replacements indicated that they did not understand themselves to be permanent employees