§

Consolidated Casinos Corporation, Sahara Division

266 N.L.R.B. 988 (N.L.R.B. 1983)
Consolidated Casinos Corporation, Sahara Division

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.

    396 U.S. 258 (1969)   Cited 184 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Alexander Dawson, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    586 F.2d 1300 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 40 times
    Holding "the content of a document, when considered with the circumstances surrounding its discovery, is an adequate basis for [its authentication]"

  6. Justak Bros. and Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    664 F.2d 1074 (7th Cir. 1981)   Cited 29 times
    Disallowing an employer to seize upon turnover, for otherwise "an employer could engage in a scheme of unfair labor practices and yet escape a bargaining order by delaying and waiting for employee turnover"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Anchorage Times Pub. Co.

    637 F.2d 1359 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 29 times

    No. 79-7024. Argued and Submitted May 8, 1980. Decided February 27, 1981. Rehearing Denied April 29, 1981. Ruah Donnelly Lahey. Washington, D.C., argued, for petitioner; Elliott Moore, NLRB, Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas A. Riggs, Anchorage, Alaska, argued, for respondent; Karl Johnstown, Anchorage, Alaska, on brief. On Petition to Review and Cross-application to Enforce a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before ANDERSON and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 433

    600 F.2d 770 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that "[t]he Board may properly find an unfair labor practice when the issue has been fully litigated even though not specifically pleaded in the complaint"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Bighorn Beverage

    614 F.2d 1238 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 24 times
    Describing relationship between sections; § 7 establishes rights and § 8 enforces them

  10. H. & F. Binch Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    456 F.2d 357 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 22 times
    Enlarging reinstatement rights of economic strikers

  11. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,581 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party

  12. Rule 804 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-When the Declarant Is Unavailable as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 804   Cited 4,048 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing an exception to the hearsay exclusionary rule when the party against whom the statement is offered has engaged in wrongdoing which procures the unavailability of the declarant