§

Consolidated Builders, Inc.

99 N.L.R.B. 972 (N.L.R.B. 1952)
Consolidated Builders, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co.

    195 F.2d 141 (9th Cir. 1952)   Cited 55 times
    Invalidating administrative order as "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion," see 5 U.S.C. § 706, because "[t]he inequity of retroactive policy making . . . is the sort of thing our system of law abhors"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Westex Boot & Shoe Co.

    190 F.2d 12 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 19 times

    No. 13402. June 25, 1951. Maurice Alexandre, Atty., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Lee Sellers, Otis E. Nelson, Wichita Falls, Tex., for respondent. Before McCORD, RUSSELL and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. The findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order of the Board are reported at 82 N.L.R.B. 497. The Company contends that the American Federation of Labor (referred

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ozark Dam Const

    190 F.2d 222 (8th Cir. 1951)   Cited 11 times

    No. 14283. July 5, 1951. Rehearing Denied July 30, 1951. Owsley Vose, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marshall J. Seidman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Ben H. Powell, Jr., Austin, Tex. (A.J. Wirtz, William A. Brown and Powell, Wirtz Rauhut, Austin, Tex., on the brief), for respondents. Before SANBORN

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Arthur G. McKee

    196 F.2d 636 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 5 times

    No. 13876. May 10, 1952. Louis Libbin, Attorney, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., and D.P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Paul Y. Cunningham, Brownsville, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Upon findings: that respondent in constructing the Carthage Hydrocol plant in Brownsville, Texas, was engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National

  5. Cathey v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    189 F.2d 428 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 4 times
    In Cathey v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 189 F.2d 428, a petition for enforcement of an order of the Labor Board was denied and the complaint dismissed by the Court of Appeals, where the union concerned had failed to comply with the non-Communist affidavit provisions of the Act.