§

Connecticut Light & Power Co.

229 N.L.R.B. 1032 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Connecticut Light & Power Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  2. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  3. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Ohio Power Co.

    531 F.2d 1381 (6th Cir. 1976)   Cited 7 times

    No. 75-1661. April 22, 1976. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Bert Bisgyer, Washington, D.C., Bernard Levine, Director, Region 8, N.L.R.B., Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. John A. McGuinn, Patterson, Belknap, Farmer Shibley, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before EDWARDS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges, and HOGAN, Chief District Judge. The Honorable Timothy S. Hogan, Chief District Judge, for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. ORDER The National Labor