Connecticut Chemical Research Corp.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Goldman v. United States

    316 U.S. 129 (1942)   Cited 359 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding the warrantless use of a detectaphone
  2. Labor Bd. v. Greyhound Lines

    303 U.S. 261 (1938)   Cited 264 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 303 U.S. 261, 58 S.Ct. 571, 572, 82 L.Ed. 831, 115 A.L.R. 307, three related corporations were involved. The two respondents claimed that the third corporation was the `employer'.
  3. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Globe Wireless

    193 F.2d 748 (9th Cir. 1951)   Cited 42 times

    No. 12736. December 27, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Albert M. Dreyer, Attorneys, NL RB, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gregory A. Harrison, Richard Ernst, Malcolm T. Dungan and Brobeck, Phleger Harrison, all of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges and LEMMON, District Judge. HEALY, Circuit Judge. This matter is before us on petition of the National

  4. F.W. Woolworth Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    121 F.2d 658 (2d Cir. 1941)   Cited 36 times

    No. 276. July 2, 1941. Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by F.W. Woolworth Company to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, and request by the board to enforce its order. Petition to review the order denied, and request for enforcement of order as modified in accordance with opinion granted. Thomas I. Sheridan and Howard L. Klein, both of New York City, for petitioner. Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp, Ernest

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Quest-Shon Mark B

    185 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 18 times

    No. 17, Docket 21624. Argued October 4, 1950. Decided November 9, 1950. Owsley Vose, Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George H. Plaut, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Adolph I. King, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard P. Walsh, Washington, D.C., and Angelo A. Tumminelli, Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for respondent. Before LEARNED HAND, Chief

  6. Montgomery Ward Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    107 F.2d 555 (7th Cir. 1939)   Cited 23 times

    No. 6826. November 7, 1939. Rehearing Denied December 8, 1939. Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by Montgomery Ward Company, Incorporated, for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Order of board enforced as modified and construed. John A. Barr, R.F. Walker Smith, and Stuart S. Ball, all of Chicago Ill. (Clarence J. Young, of Portland, Or., of counsel), for petitioner. Ernest A. Gross, of Washington, D.C., Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel

  7. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Vail Mfg. Co.

    158 F.2d 664 (7th Cir. 1947)   Cited 10 times

    No. 9107. January 2, 1947. Rehearing Denied January 23, 1947. Petition for Enforcement of Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against Vail Manufacturing Company for enforcement of order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition for enforcement granted. David A. Morse and A. Norman Somers, both of Washington, D.C., Francis X. Helgesen, of Buffalo, N.Y., and Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris P. Gulshien, Associate Gen. Counsel, both

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fulton Bag

    180 F.2d 68 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 7 times

    No. 3932. January 3, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 15, 1950. Edward Friedman, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, and Mozart G. Ratner and George H. Plaut, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief) for petitioner. Kenneth W. Robinson Denver, Colo. (Robert D. Charlton and Robert Swanson Denver, Colo., were with him on the brief), for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON