§

Cone Mills Corp.---White Oak Plant

298 N.L.R.B. 661 (N.L.R.B. 1990)
Cone Mills Corp.---White Oak Plant

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Consolidated Freightways v. N.L.R.B

    892 F.2d 1052 (D.C. Cir. 1989)   Cited 13 times
    Recognizing "a general principle" that retroactive application of rules is permitted "absent any manifest injustice"

  4. Darr v. N.L.R.B

    801 F.2d 1404 (D.C. Cir. 1986)   Cited 16 times
    Remanding where Board did not clearly explain basis for its decision

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Hribar Trucking, Inc.

    406 F.2d 854 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 4 times

    No. 16791. January 31, 1969. Rehearing Denied March 7, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Walter S. Davis, Russ R. Mueller, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Senior Circuit Judge, and KILEY and FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judges. KILEY, Circuit Judge. The Labor Board's petition seeks enforcement of its order finding violations of Sec

  6. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,061 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB