§

Cone Brothers Contracting Co.

158 N.L.R.B. 186 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
Cone Brothers Contracting Co.

35 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  2. Nabors v. N.L.R.B

    323 F.2d 686 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 59 times
    Holding that NLRB acts in public capacity and “[t]he fact that these proceedings operate to confer an incidental benefit on private persons does not detract from this public purpose”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. C.C.C. Associates, Inc.

    306 F.2d 534 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 34 times

    Nos. 246, 302, Docket 27254, 27313. Argued May 23, 1962. Decided July 30, 1962. Stephen B. Goldberg, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel and Mary Louise Griffin, on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Charles R. Katz, New York City (Katz Wolchok, New York City, on the brief), for C.C.C. Associates, Inc., et al. James V. Altieri, New York City, for

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Ozark Hardwood Company

    282 F.2d 1 (8th Cir. 1960)   Cited 35 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Ozark Hardwood Co., 282 F.2d 1 (8th Cir. 1960), the 8th Circuit also indicated that courts of appeals could make successorship determinations.

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Baltimore T. Co.

    140 F.2d 51 (4th Cir. 1944)   Cited 57 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Baltimore T. Co., 4 Cir., 140 F.2d 51, the court alluded with apparent approval to the fact that the Board had endeavored to avoid making its sanctions operate retroactively.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Cambria Clay Prod

    215 F.2d 48 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 35 times

    No. 12072. July 7, 1954. Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, Thomas R. Haley, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio (J. Mack Swigert, Charles D. Lindberg, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief; Miller, Searl Fitch, Portsmouth, Ohio, of counsel), for respondent. Before McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and GOURLEY, District Judge. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  7. National Labor Bd. v. J.H. Rutter-Rex MFG

    245 F.2d 594 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 26 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. J.H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Company, 245 F.2d 594, we held that (1) the duty of the Company to bargain with the certified Union did not terminate with the calling or execution of the strike, (2) the Company had been guilty of unfair labor practices in refusing to bargain collectively with the Union and in interfering with the employees in the exercise of their right to organize and bargain collectively, and (3) the Union had not been guilty of any practice justifying employer in breaking off bargaining negotiations.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Brown Root, Inc

    203 F.2d 139 (8th Cir. 1953)   Cited 29 times

    No. 14680. March 24, 1953. Rehearing Denied July 8, 1953. Harvey B. Diamond, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen., Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Owsley Vose, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief) for petitioner. Ben H. Powell, Jr., Austin, Tex. (William A. Brown and Powell, Wirtz Rauhut, Austin, Tex., on the brief) for respondent Ozark Dam Constructors. Ben H.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. United States Air Con. Corp.

    336 F.2d 275 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 14 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. United States Air Con. Corp., 336 F.2d 275, 276 (6th Cir. 1964), the court held that the Board's finding of constructive discharge was supported by substantial evidence where, although the five discharged employees were reemployed, it was not to their former or substantially equivalent positions.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.

    310 F.2d 565 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 15 times

    No. 19448. November 28, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Peter M. Giesey, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Hal Rachal, Midland, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, WISDOM, and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for summary enforcement of its order against Mooney