§

Concrete Pipe & Products Co., Inc.

74 N.L.R.B. 905 (N.L.R.B. 1947)
Concrete Pipe & Products Co., Inc.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Virginia Power Co.

    314 U.S. 469 (1941)   Cited 169 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Virginia Electric Power Co., 314 U.S. 469, 477, 62 S.Ct. 344, 348, 86 L.Ed. 348 (1941), the Supreme court concluded that the Wagner Act could not be interpreted to prohibit an employer from exercising his First Amendment right to express his views to employees on the merits of unionization, provided the expression was neither coercive nor part of a coercive course of conduct.

  2. Inland Empire Council v. Millis

    325 U.S. 697 (1945)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Inland Empire, a union that had lost a representation election brought suit in district court challenging the Board's proceedings on the ground that there had not been the "appropriate hearing" mandated by Section 9(c) of the NLRA. It argued that the failure to provide such a hearing violated the union's statutory and due process rights.

  3. Matter of Inland Steel Co., (N.D.Ind. 1980)

    492 F. Supp. 1310 (N.D. Ind. 1980)   Cited 12 times
    In Inland Steel, the district judge examined the structure and legislative history of section 8 of the Act and concluded that Congress did not intend to grant the Secretary of Labor the authority to inspect documents pursuant to a warrant.