Concord Metal, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Golden State Transit Corp. v. Los Angeles

    493 U.S. 103 (1989)   Cited 730 times
    Holding with regard to the National Labor Relations Act, a statute enacted pursuant to the Commerce Clause rather than the Spending Clause, that a right implied from the structure of the statute but not explicitly stated is enforceable under § 1983
  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  3. Golden State Transit Corp. v. Los Angeles

    475 U.S. 608 (1986)   Cited 172 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Los Angeles could not condition renewal of a taxi cab franchise upon settlement of a labor dispute
  4. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice
  5. Fugazy Continental Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    725 F.2d 1416 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 23 times
    Affirming alter ego finding where only portion of company's operations were shut and transferred to a new, "sham" company established to perform the same work
  6. National Labor Rel. Board, v. Fox Painting Co.

    732 F.2d 554 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 2 times

    No. 83-5142. Argued March 13, 1984. Decided April 25, 1984. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Helen Morgan, L. Pat Wynns, Ellen Boardman, argued, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. C. Wayne Shepherd, Donald P. Wagner, Stoll, Keenon Park, Robert F. Houlihan, argued, Lexington, Ky., for respondent. Before ENGEL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court on the application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement