§

Con-way Freight Inc.

366 NLRB No. 183 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
Con-way Freight Inc.

25 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  3. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Laurel Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

    502 U.S. 814 (1991)   Cited 78 times

    No. 90-1805. October 7, 1991, OCTOBER TERM, 1991. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 924 F. 2d 539.

  6. SCA Tissue North America LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    371 F.3d 983 (7th Cir. 2004)   Cited 34 times
    Finding employer terminated employee based on antiunion animus in part because of employer's comment about employee's "attitude"

  7. Sutter E. Bay Hosps. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    687 F.3d 424 (D.C. Cir. 2012)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding the Board's finding that a hospital changed solicitation rules in order to “squelch union activity” when it suddenly began to prohibit outside groups from meeting in the cafeteria

  8. King Soopers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    859 F.3d 23 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16-1316 C/w 16-1367 06-09-2017 KING SOOPERS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Raymond M. Deeny, Colorado Springs, CO, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jonathon M. Watson, Denver, CO. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert

  9. Laro Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    56 F.3d 224 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Inferring discriminatory motive from, inter alia, an employer's professed desire to hire the best qualified workers and the employer's subsequent decision to hire employees with no relevant experience over union members with experience

  10. Cellco P'ship v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    892 F.3d 1256 (D.C. Cir. 2018)   Cited 1 times

    No. 17-1158 C/w 17-1165 06-19-2018 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Communications Workers of America, Intervenor Arthur G. Telegen argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Robert A. Fisher and N. Skelly Harper. Barbara A. Sheehy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Peter B. Robb, General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Usha Dheenan