§

COMPX International Inc. v. Robert Walter Harvey

No. 91176664 (T.T.A.B. May. 27, 2008)
COMPX International Inc. v. Robert Walter Harvey

6 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 222,793 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

  2. Ritchie v. Simpson

    170 F.3d 1092 (Fed. Cir. 1999)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding “real interest” is shown by “a direct and personal stake in the outcome” or a “legitimate personal interest.”

  3. Lipton Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina

    670 F.2d 1024 (C.C.P.A. 1982)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that admission contained in an answer was binding, despite the fact that it was made "on information and belief"

  4. M.L.E. Music v. Kimble, Inc.

    109 F. Supp. 2d 469 (S.D.W. Va. 2000)   Cited 14 times
    Awarding $10,000.00 in statutory damages when licensing fees totaled $3,545.00

  5. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 339,855 times   162 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  6. Rule 36 - Requests for Admission

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 36   Cited 6,414 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Noting that facts admitted pursuant to a Rule 36 discovery request are "conclusively established unless the court, on motion, permits the admission to be withdrawn or amended"