Complainant, v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.
5 Cited authorities
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
477 U.S. 242 (1986) Cited 243,268 times 39 Legal AnalysesHolding that summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence is "so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law"
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
477 U.S. 317 (1986) Cited 222,371 times 41 Legal AnalysesHolding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio
475 U.S. 574 (1986) Cited 116,282 times 38 Legal AnalysesHolding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corp.
846 F.2d 103 (1st Cir. 1988) Cited 413 timesHolding that discharge over two and one half years after employee filed EEOC complaint was insufficient showing of retaliation to avoid summary judgment for employer
Bauer v. Bailar
647 F.2d 1037 (10th Cir. 1981) Cited 81 timesHolding employer's subjective hiring criteria to be nonpretextual where the subjective factors considered were articulated and generally relevant to the job