§

Community Trust Bank

No. 76685026 (T.T.A.B. Sep. 25, 2009)
Community Trust Bank

23 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. v. Cherry

    330 F.3d 658 (4th Cir. 2003)   Cited 367 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding money laundering counts sufficiently pleaded where the indictment alleged "that the money laundering transactions involved funds derived from a specified unlawful activity, and that such activity violated 18 U.S.C. § 656"

  2. Rubke v. Capitol Bancorp Ltd.

    551 F.3d 1156 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 209 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of motive and opportunity were not enough to create a strong inference of scienter

  3. Retail Services, Inc. v. Freebies Publishing

    364 F.3d 535 (4th Cir. 2004)   Cited 171 times
    Holding that online search evidence of pervasive third-party use of the term "freebies" was persuasive evidence that the term is generic

  4. Sun Banks of Fla. v. Sun Fed. Sav. Loan

    651 F.2d 311 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 200 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that nineteen reports of consumer confusion over a three year period was a “negligible” “amount of past confusion.”

  5. Blau Plumbing, Inc. v. S.O.S. Fix-It, Inc.

    781 F.2d 604 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 161 times
    Holding that a "location box" in an advertisement was descriptive and lacked secondary meaning

  6. First Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. First Bank Sys

    101 F.3d 645 (10th Cir. 1996)   Cited 112 times
    Holding the district court erred by relying too heavily on the appearance and pronunciation of the marks where the differences between the entire marks and their attending logos outweighed the similarities

  7. Freedom Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. Way

    757 F.2d 1176 (11th Cir. 1985)   Cited 140 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "Freedom Realty" and "Freedom Savings and Loan" are not sufficiently similar

  8. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

    476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 193 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"

  9. Palm Bay Imp. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin

    396 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2005)   Cited 73 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Finding similarity between "VEUVE ROYALE" and "VEUVE CLICQUOT" because "VEUVE ... remains a ‘prominent feature’ as the first word in the mark and the first word to appear on the label"

  10. Recot, Inc. v. Becton

    214 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2000)   Cited 57 times
    Holding that the Board legally erred in not according sufficient weight to evidence of a mark's fame in a likelihood of confusion analysis, vacating, and remanding for further consideration

  11. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,615 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"

  12. Section 19.111 - Suspension, removal, or prohibition

    12 C.F.R. § 19.111

    The Comptroller may serve a notice of suspension or order of removal or prohibition pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 1818(g) on an institution-affiliated party. A copy of such notice or order will be served on any depository institution that the subject of the notice or order is affiliated with at the time the notice or order is issued, whereupon the institution-affiliated party involved must immediately cease service to, or participation in the affairs of, that depository institution and, if so determined