Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that the Board "is not free to prescribe what inferences from the evidence it will accept and reject, but must draw all those inferences that the evidence fairly demands"

Labor Board v. Katz

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.

Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"

Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.

Finding a marketing hours limitation contained in a multiemployer contract exempt from antitrust liability because its purpose was to protect the wages, hours, and working conditions of the union's members

Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

In Vincent Industrial, we directed the Board to premise every bargaining order on an "explicit[ balanc[ing][of] three considerations: (1) the employees' Section 7 rights [ 29 U.S.C. § 157]; (2) whether other purposes of the [NLRA] override the rights of employees to choose their bargaining representatives; and (3) whether alternative remedies are adequate to remedy the violations of the [NLRA]]."

Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Stressing appropriateness of bargaining order to remedy bad faith bargaining during certification year

Marion Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

Acknowledging change in Board policy effected by Levitz Furniture Co.

N.L.R.B. v. Dothan Eagle, Inc.