§

Communications Workers of America and Communications Workers of America, Local 4309

359 N.L.R.B. 1136 (N.L.R.B. 2013)
Communications Workers of America and Communications Workers of America, Local 4309

8 Cited authorities

  1. Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill

    499 U.S. 65 (1991)   Cited 1,076 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"

  2. Communications Workers of America v. Beck

    487 U.S. 735 (1988)   Cited 277 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.

    494 U.S. 775 (1990)   Cited 177 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"

  4. Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc.

    525 U.S. 813 (1998)   Cited 44 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No. 97-1846. October 5, 1998. ORDERS C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 130 F. 3d 1101.

  5. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 24 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting that in challenge to extra-unit fees, litigation expenses were "treated separately by the parties but [are] analytically identical, as far as we can see"

  6. Richards v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    702 F.3d 1010 (7th Cir. 2012)   Cited 7 times

    Nos. 12–1973 12–1984. 2012-12-26 Douglas RICHARDS, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL–CIO/CLC, et al., Intervenors–Respondents. Glenn M. Taubman (argued), Attorney, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Springfield, VA, for Petitioners. Heather S. Beard (argued), Ruth E. Burdick, Linda Dreeben, Attorneys, Office of the General

  7. Cieklinski v. National Labor Relations

    224 F. App'x 727 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 1 times

    No. 05-75079. Submitted March 12, 2007. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2). Filed March 16, 2007. Michael Cieklinski, Henderson, NV, pro se. Regional Director, National Labor Relations Board, Phoenix, AZ, Aileen A. Armstrong, Esq., Fred B. Jacob, Gregory Lauro, Esq., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB Nos. 28-CB-6013

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Monark Boat Co.

    800 F.2d 191 (8th Cir. 1986)   Cited 9 times
    Upholding the certification of a labor organization as a collective bargaining representative where 77 of 167 employees voted in favor of union representation and 57 voted against