Communications Workers Local 9431 (Pacific Bell)

8 Cited authorities

Vaca v. Sipes
386 U.S. 171 (1967) Cited 4,209 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
Amalgamated Cloth. Tex. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B
736 F.2d 1559 (D.C. Cir. 1984) Cited 39 times
Finding the Board's decision not to overturn an election based on anonymous incidents was within its discretion because ordering a rerun election on that basis would “risk futility” and would “be devastatingly unfair to the majority of employees who have voted for the union”
Abilene Sheet Metal, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
619 F.2d 332 (5th Cir. 1980) Cited 42 times
Finding substantial evidence to affirm the conclusion that a company foreman was a supervisor
Kux Manufacturing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
890 F.2d 804 (6th Cir. 1989) Cited 20 times
Finding conduct of members of in-plant organizing committee not attributable to union
Tuf-Flex Glass v. N.L.R.B
715 F.2d 291 (7th Cir. 1983) Cited 22 times
In Libbey-Owens-Ford, a pro-union employee, Arias, threatened to file an unspecified "complaint" against a fellow employee if the latter did not vote for and tell others to vote for the union.
N.L.R.B. v. Herbert Halperin Distrib. Corp.
826 F.2d 287 (4th Cir. 1987) Cited 16 times
Holding that an employer seeking to set aside an election bears the “heavy burden” of showing that infractions “materially affected the election results”
N.L.R.B. v. Miramar of California, Inc.
601 F.2d 422 (9th Cir. 1979) Cited 15 times
No. 78-1419. July 24, 1979. Elliot Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Michael Messitte (argued), Washington, D.C., for the N.L.R.B. Jeffrey H. Nelson (argued), Nelson Nelson, Los Angeles, Cal., for Miramar of California, Inc. On Petition for Review and Enforcement of the Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GOODWIN and TANG, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge. Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation
Local 594, Int'l U., United Auto. v. N.L.R.B
776 F.2d 1310 (6th Cir. 1985) Cited 3 times
Nos. 84-5962, 84-6086. Argued October 1, 1985. Decided November 12, 1985. Carlton R. Roeser, argued, Robert L. O'Connell and Associates, Pontiac, Mich., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Daniel Pollitt, argued, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRITT and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and, CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: This case is before the court on the petition of Local 594, International

Communications Workers Local 9431 (Pacific Bell)

8 Cited authorities

Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

Finding the Board's decision not to overturn an election based on anonymous incidents was within its discretion because ordering a rerun election on that basis would “risk futility” and would “be devastatingly unfair to the majority of employees who have voted for the union”

Finding substantial evidence to affirm the conclusion that a company foreman was a supervisor

Finding conduct of members of in-plant organizing committee not attributable to union

In Libbey-Owens-Ford, a pro-union employee, Arias, threatened to file an unspecified "complaint" against a fellow employee if the latter did not vote for and tell others to vote for the union.

Holding that an employer seeking to set aside an election bears the “heavy burden” of showing that infractions “materially affected the election results”