Communications Workers Local 6360

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"
  2. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
  3. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thor Power Tool Co.

    351 F.2d 584 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 68 times
    Concluding that "when the entire record is considered there was substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that [employee's] discharge was the result of his having presented a grievance to the management" even though employee was overheard referring to company's superintendent as "the horse's ass" and was thereafter summarily discharged
  5. Syncro Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    597 F.2d 922 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 16 times

    No. 78-1580. June 25, 1979. Gardner, Ambrister Smith, George V. Gardner, Washington, D.C., Asa Ambrister, Nashville, Tenn., for petitioner, cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate, Gen. Counsel, Morton Namrow, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Donald E. Howard, Resident Officer, Birmingham, Ala

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Charles Batchelder Co., Inc.

    646 F.2d 33 (2d Cir. 1981)   Cited 14 times
    Finding the National Labor Relations Board's conclusion unsupported by substantial evidence where it "used speculation" to conclude that an employee quit because of the employer's anti-union animus where the record "indicate[d] only a weak showing of ... animus," and noting that "union membership alone does not measure up to substantial evidence"
  7. Excavation-Construction, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    660 F.2d 1015 (4th Cir. 1981)   Cited 9 times
    In Excavation-Construction, Inc. v. NLRB, 660 F.2d 1015, 1019-20 (4th Cir. 1981), the employer had unilaterally imposed a policy of no overtime pay on Saturday unless the hours worked were in excess of 40 for the week.
  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation
  9. Chicago Magnesium Castings Co. v. N.L.R.B

    612 F.2d 1028 (7th Cir. 1980)   Cited 5 times

    No. 79-1284. Argued October 26, 1979. Decided January 7, 1980. David N. Barkhausen, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. J. Keith Gorham, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before SWYGERT, CUMMINGS and BAUER, Circuit Judges. CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge. Chicago Magnesium Castings Company has petitioned us to set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, while the Board has filed a cross-application for enforcement of its order requiring the Company to bargain in good faith with the Union

  10. H.L. Meyer Company v. N.L.R.B

    426 F.2d 1090 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 8 times

    No. 19818. May 19, 1970. As Modified June 8, 1970. F. Lee Major and Clifton L. Elliott, of Spencer, Fane, Britt Browne, Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner. Donald W. Savelson, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Robert A. Giannasi, Attorney, N.L.R.B., were on the brief. Before BLACKMUN, GIBSON and LAY, Circuit Judges. LAY, Circuit Judge

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,095 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"