Communication Workers of America

6 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.
369 U.S. 404 (1962) Cited 298 times
Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"
Carry Companies of Illinois, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
30 F.3d 922 (7th Cir. 1994) Cited 34 times
Acknowledging that, "where an employer establishes a regular pattern of overlooking certain violations of company policy, the employer may not later rely on such violations to satisfy its burden under Wright Line."
Ready Mixed Concrete v. Nat. Lab. Rel. Bd.
81 F.3d 1546 (10th Cir. 1996) Cited 24 times
Imputing supervisor's knowledge of employee's union activities to company where supervisor had anti-union animus, but acknowledging that decision-maker admitted he probably knew of employee's union activities
Holo-Krome Co. v. N.L.R.B
907 F.2d 1343 (2d Cir. 1990) Cited 14 times
Holding the Board's use of employer's protected expressions of opinion against union as a basis for finding animus to be contrary to section 8(c)
N.L.R.B. v. Advance Transp. Co.
979 F.2d 569 (7th Cir. 1992) Cited 8 times
Holding that evidence of a cursory investigation can give rise to an inference of an unlawful motive
Nachman Corporation v. N.L.R.B
337 F.2d 421 (7th Cir. 1964) Cited 11 times
No. 14566. October 7, 1964. Fredric N. Richman, Sidney R. Korshak, David H. Mendelsohn, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George H. Cohen, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Seymour Strongin, Attys., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before DUFFY, SCHNACKENBERG and KILEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by Nachman Corporation to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations

Communication Workers of America

6 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

Carry Companies of Illinois, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Acknowledging that, "where an employer establishes a regular pattern of overlooking certain violations of company policy, the employer may not later rely on such violations to satisfy its burden under Wright Line."

Ready Mixed Concrete v. Nat. Lab. Rel. Bd.

Imputing supervisor's knowledge of employee's union activities to company where supervisor had anti-union animus, but acknowledging that decision-maker admitted he probably knew of employee's union activities

Holo-Krome Co. v. N.L.R.B

Holding the Board's use of employer's protected expressions of opinion against union as a basis for finding animus to be contrary to section 8(c)

N.L.R.B. v. Advance Transp. Co.

Holding that evidence of a cursory investigation can give rise to an inference of an unlawful motive

Nachman Corporation v. N.L.R.B