Combustion Engineering, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

Gateway Coal Co. v. Mine Workers
414 U.S. 368 (1974) Cited 369 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that contractual agreement to submit disagreements to binding arbitration included disputes over safety and thus gave rise to implied obligation not to strike over such disputes
Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.
344 U.S. 344 (1953) Cited 368 times
Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding
Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
Philip Carey Mfg., v. N.L.R.B
331 F.2d 720 (6th Cir. 1964) Cited 42 times
Nos. 15289, 15330. March 31, 1964. J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio, Frank H. Stewart, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief; E.J. Fasold, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel, for Philip Carey Mfg. Co. Lowell Goerlich, Washington, D.C., for International Union, etc. William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for N.L.R.B. Before
N.L.R.B. v. Leslie Metal Arts Company, Inc.
509 F.2d 811 (6th Cir. 1975) Cited 16 times
In Leslie, however, the court went on to enforce the Board's order, which had found the walkout at issue to be protected activity.
Teamsters, Chauffeurs Helpers v. N.L.R.B
325 F.2d 1011 (D.C. Cir. 1963) Cited 22 times
No. 16415. Argued November 12, 1963. Decided December 5, 1963. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Hugh Hafer, Seattle, Wash., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., with whom
Clark Eng. Const. v. U. Bro. of Carpenters
510 F.2d 1075 (6th Cir. 1975) Cited 6 times
No. 74-1312. February 17, 1975. Charles S. Wible, Lovett, Wible Lamar, Owensboro, Ky., for plaintiff-appellant. Charles R. Isenberg, Segal, Isenberg, Sales Stewart, Thomas G. Jarrell, Louisville, Ky., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. Before WEICK, EDWARDS and McCREE, Circuit Judges. WEICK, Circuit Judge. Clark Engineering and Construction Company (Clark), a Kentucky corporation, brought suit in the District Court against
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Knight Morley Corp.
251 F.2d 753 (6th Cir. 1958) Cited 20 times
Holding that § 502's purpose was to give employees a right to walk off the job because of abnormally dangerous conditions "even in the face of a no-strike clause in their contract with an employer"

Combustion Engineering, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

Finding that contractual agreement to submit disagreements to binding arbitration included disputes over safety and thus gave rise to implied obligation not to strike over such disputes

Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

In Leslie, however, the court went on to enforce the Board's order, which had found the walkout at issue to be protected activity.

Holding that § 502's purpose was to give employees a right to walk off the job because of abnormally dangerous conditions "even in the face of a no-strike clause in their contract with an employer"