Comar, Inc.

29 Cited authorities

First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
452 U.S. 666 (1981) Cited 270 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons
Holly Farms Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
517 U.S. 392 (1996) Cited 136 times
Holding that where statute's meaning is obvious, courts and Board must defer to Congress's unambiguous intent, but where ambiguity exists, courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the statute
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Genetics Institute, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc.
502 U.S. 856 (1991) Cited 80 times
Holding that Connecticut's overtime wage law is not preempted by FLSA
Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board
321 U.S. 702 (1944) Cited 252 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
Tonka Corp. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.
511 U.S. 1083 (1994) Cited 24 times
No. 93-1491. May 16, 1994. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 9 F. 3d 51.
Atlantic Limousine, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
243 F.3d 711 (3d Cir. 2001) Cited 69 times
Concluding that the National Labor Relations Board is not bound by under-reported tip amount in calculating lost tip income
California Pacific Medical v. N.L.R.B
87 F.3d 304 (9th Cir. 1996) Cited 26 times
No. 93-71039, 94-70009 Argued and Submitted August 15, 1995, San Francisco, California Filed June 19, 1996 Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Robertson, Falk Rabkin, San Francisco, California, for the petitioner-respondent. Richard A. Cohen, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for the respondent-petitioner. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB No. 20-CA-24067. Before: BETTY B. FLETCHER, CECIL F. POOLE, and DIARMUID
Sever v. N.L.R.B
231 F.3d 1156 (9th Cir. 2000) Cited 20 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that argument is waived where employee did not raise it in its exceptions to ALJ's decision
Serramonte Oldsmobile, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
86 F.3d 227 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Cited 25 times 2 Legal Analyses
Concluding impasse was valid where "not a single one of the Union's statements . . . actually committed the Union to a new position or contained any specific proposals"

Comar, Inc.

29 Cited authorities

Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

Holding that where statute's meaning is obvious, courts and Board must defer to Congress's unambiguous intent, but where ambiguity exists, courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the statute

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Holding that Connecticut's overtime wage law is not preempted by FLSA

Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

Concluding that the National Labor Relations Board is not bound by under-reported tip amount in calculating lost tip income

Holding that argument is waived where employee did not raise it in its exceptions to ALJ's decision

Concluding impasse was valid where "not a single one of the Union's statements . . . actually committed the Union to a new position or contained any specific proposals"