Columbus Maintenance Co.

7 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.
394 U.S. 759 (1969) Cited 814 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication
Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
440 U.S. 301 (1979) Cited 228 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v. N.L.R.B
652 F.2d 1055 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 97 times
Holding that the employer "must bargain with respect to the decision to remove work from bargaining unit employees, not merely its effects on the employees"
Emeryville Ctr., Shell Dev. v. N.L.R.B
441 F.2d 880 (9th Cir. 1971) Cited 29 times
In Emeryville, the union requested salary grade curves, individual salaries, and merit ratings for 430 unit professional employees to enable the union "to bargain intelligently."
N.L.R.B. v. A. S. Abell Co.
624 F.2d 506 (4th Cir. 1980) Cited 9 times
No. 77-2214. Argued July 11, 1979. Decided July 2, 1980. Vivian A. Miller, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Robert E. Paul, Arlington, Va. (Spelman, Eisenberg, Paul Wagner, Arlington, Va., on brief), for intervenor. N. Peter Lareau, Baltimore, Md. (Venable, Baetjer Howard, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for
Kroger Co. v. N.L.R.B
399 F.2d 455 (6th Cir. 1968) Cited 11 times
In Kroger, the court stated that "... it is perhaps significant in this case that the union's showing of need for purposes of collective bargaining is more general and theoretical than immediate and practical."

Columbus Maintenance Co.

7 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.

Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication

Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v. N.L.R.B

Holding that the employer "must bargain with respect to the decision to remove work from bargaining unit employees, not merely its effects on the employees"

Emeryville Ctr., Shell Dev. v. N.L.R.B

In Emeryville, the union requested salary grade curves, individual salaries, and merit ratings for 430 unit professional employees to enable the union "to bargain intelligently."

N.L.R.B. v. A. S. Abell Co.

Kroger Co. v. N.L.R.B

In Kroger, the court stated that "... it is perhaps significant in this case that the union's showing of need for purposes of collective bargaining is more general and theoretical than immediate and practical."