Columbia Typographical Union No. 101
2 Cited authorities
Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B
176 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1949) Cited 64 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that plain and unambiguous text must be applied as written without resort to construction
International Wdwkr., Am., 3-10 v. N.L.R.B
380 F.2d 628 (D.C. Cir. 1967) Cited 11 timesNo. 20526. Argued April 14, 1967. Decided June 15, 1967. Petition for Rehearing Denied August 17, 1967. Mr. John Silard, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mrs. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. George J. Tichy, Spokane, Wash., was on the brief for intervenor