§

Columbia Steel Co.

67 N.L.R.B. 529 (N.L.R.B. 1946)
Columbia Steel Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Board v. Hearst Publications

    322 U.S. 111 (1944)   Cited 792 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")

  2. A.F. of L. v. Labor Board

    308 U.S. 401 (1940)   Cited 341 times
    Holding that certification is not a final order

  3. Labor Board v. Falk Corp.

    308 U.S. 453 (1940)   Cited 140 times
    In Falk, the two proceedings were held simultaneously, whereas in our case the representation case preceded the unfair labor case.

  4. Inland Empire Council v. Millis

    325 U.S. 697 (1945)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Inland Empire, a union that had lost a representation election brought suit in district court challenging the Board's proceedings on the ground that there had not been the "appropriate hearing" mandated by Section 9(c) of the NLRA. It argued that the failure to provide such a hearing violated the union's statutory and due process rights.

  5. Labor Board v. Int. Brotherhood

    308 U.S. 413 (1940)   Cited 50 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 253. Argued December 8, 1939. Decided January 2, 1940. A direction for an election made by the National Labor Relations Board in a representation proceeding under § 9(c) of the National Labor Relations Act is not reviewable by a Circuit Court of Appeals under § 10 of the Act. American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board, ante, p. 401. P. 414. 105 F.2d 598, reversed. CERTIORARI, post, p. 537, to review a judgment

  6. Northrop Corp. v. Madden

    30 F. Supp. 993 (S.D. Cal. 1937)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 1235-M, 1230-H. August 18, 1937. H.W. Elliott, of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs. William R. Walsh, of Washington, D.C., Counsel for The National Labor Relations Board, and Pierson M. Hall, U.S. Atty., of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants. YANKWICH, Judge (after stating the facts as above). The motions to dismiss the Complaints are granted. This Court has no jurisdiction to review the action of the National Labor Relations Board and its Regional Director in calling an election at the airplane