Columbia Portland Cement Co.

5 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.
494 U.S. 775 (1990) Cited 177 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"
Labor Board v. Mackay Co.
304 U.S. 333 (1938) Cited 535 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
Hotel, Motel Restaurant Employees v. N.L.R.B
785 F.2d 796 (9th Cir. 1986) Cited 13 times
No. 85-7106. Argued and Submitted November 13, 1985. Decided March 25, 1986. David Rosenfeld, William A. Sokol. Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger Rosenfeld, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners. William Stewart, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Susan Ardissan, M. Armon Cooper, Lukens, St. Peter Cooper, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor-respondent. Burger Pits, Inc. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED, KENNEDY and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge.
Columbia Portland Cement Co. v. N.L.R.B
915 F.2d 253 (6th Cir. 1990) Cited 7 times
Balancing these competing principles and fully evaluating the facts to conclude that a work stoppage was protected activity when the employees took reasonable precautions to protect equipment even though the equipment was damaged
N.L.R.B. v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co.
359 F.2d 799 (7th Cir. 1966) Cited 12 times
In NLRB v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co., 359 F.2d 799, 800 (7th Cir. 1966), the evidence showed a narrow margin of victory by the union in an election two years earlier and high employee turnover.

Columbia Portland Cement Co.

5 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.

Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"

Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

Hotel, Motel Restaurant Employees v. N.L.R.B

Columbia Portland Cement Co. v. N.L.R.B

Balancing these competing principles and fully evaluating the facts to conclude that a work stoppage was protected activity when the employees took reasonable precautions to protect equipment even though the equipment was damaged

N.L.R.B. v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co.

In NLRB v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co., 359 F.2d 799, 800 (7th Cir. 1966), the evidence showed a narrow margin of victory by the union in an election two years earlier and high employee turnover.