Columbia College Chicago

30 Cited authorities

14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett
556 U.S. 247 (2009) Cited 553 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding that a collective bargaining agreement that "clearly and unmistakably requires union members to arbitrate [Age Discrimination in Employment Act] claims is enforceable as a matter of federal law"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
452 U.S. 666 (1981) Cited 269 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons
Holly Farms Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
517 U.S. 392 (1996) Cited 136 times
Holding that where statute's meaning is obvious, courts and Board must defer to Congress's unambiguous intent, but where ambiguity exists, courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the statute
Labor Board v. Insurance Agents
361 U.S. 477 (1960) Cited 324 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"
H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
397 U.S. 99 (1970) Cited 222 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."
Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.
343 U.S. 395 (1952) Cited 269 times
Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"
N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service
8 F.3d 832 (D.C. Cir. 1993) Cited 50 times 11 Legal Analyses
Upholding postal service's exercise of contractual right to reduce employees' hours in response to budget reduction
Department of the Navy, Marine Corps Logistics Base v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
962 F.2d 48 (D.C. Cir. 1992) Cited 44 times 2 Legal Analyses
Outlining FLRA position
Bath Marine v. N.L.R.B
475 F.3d 14 (1st Cir. 2007) Cited 20 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a motion for reconsideration was not required to exhaust where the Board had "adequate notice" of the party's position

Columbia College Chicago

30 Cited authorities

Holding that a collective bargaining agreement that "clearly and unmistakably requires union members to arbitrate [Age Discrimination in Employment Act] claims is enforceable as a matter of federal law"

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

Holding that where statute's meaning is obvious, courts and Board must defer to Congress's unambiguous intent, but where ambiguity exists, courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the statute

Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."

Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

Upholding postal service's exercise of contractual right to reduce employees' hours in response to budget reduction

Outlining FLRA position

Holding that a motion for reconsideration was not required to exhaust where the Board had "adequate notice" of the party's position