§

Colorado-Ute Electric Association, Inc.

295 N.L.R.B. 607 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Colorado-Ute Electric Association, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  3. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

  4. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying Taft

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

  6. N.L.R.B. v. A-1 King Size Sandwiches, Inc.

    732 F.2d 872 (11th Cir. 1984)   Cited 33 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Listing mandatory subjects of bargaining

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Tomco Communications, Inc.

    567 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 37 times
    Taking into consideration, in determining substantiality of evidence, that the Board diverged from the ALJ's findings on matters of credibility

  8. Seattle-First Nat. Bank v. N.L.R.B

    638 F.2d 1221 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 20 times

    No. 79-7157. Argued and Submitted September 9, 1980. Decided February 5, 1981. Mark A. Hutchenson (argued), Davis, Wright, Todd, Riese Jones, Seattle, Wash., George R. Murphy, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Marjorie Gofreed, Washington, D.C., for respondent; Elliott Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application For Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges and JAMESON, District

  9. Pease Co. v. N.L.R.B

    666 F.2d 1044 (6th Cir. 1981)   Cited 17 times
    Finding supervisor's statement that "in a couple more months he would not have to hear any grievances" was "trivial and ambiguous" where there was "no background of anti-union animus by employer"

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford

    465 F.2d 717 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 22 times
    In NLRB v. Holmes Tuttle Broadway Ford, Inc., 465 F.2d 717 (9th Cir. 1972), the court found substantial evidence of bad faith where the Company, after months of bargaining leading to the Union's acceptance of its proposals, raised spurious objections to its own proposals, and then stated that it would only sign a contract of seven weeks duration.

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"