§
Cold Steel, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. W.W.W. Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. Gillette Co.

    984 F.2d 567 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 291 times
    Holding that knowledge of an earlier mark, in the absence of additional evidence indicating an intent to promote confusion or exploit good will or reputation, does not constitute good faith

  2. W.W.W. Pharmaceutical Co. v. Gillette

    808 F. Supp. 1013 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)   Cited 21 times
    In W.W.W. Pharm. Co., the strength of the SPORTSTICK mark resided in the composite mark, not "sport" or "stick" standing alone.

  3. Federated Foods v. Fort Howard Paper Co.

    544 F.2d 1098 (C.C.P.A. 1976)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the mere existence of modern supermarket containing wide variety or products should not foreclose further inquiry into the likelihood of confusion arising from the use of similar marks on any goods so displayed

  4. Canada Dry Corp. v. Am. Home Products Corp.

    468 F.2d 207 (C.C.P.A. 1972)   Cited 2 times

    October 26, 1972. Francis J. Sullivan, attorney of record, for appellant. Mortimer Altin, Julius A. Bell, New York City, attorneys of record, for appellee. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN, and LANE, Judges. ALMOND, Judge. This is an appeal from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 164 USPQ 154, dismissing appellant's opposition upon the ground that registration of the trademark in question is not reasonably likely

  5. Jaquet-Girard S.A. v. Girard Perregaux & Cie., S.A.

    423 F.2d 1395 (C.C.P.A. 1970)   Cited 2 times

    Patent Appeal No. 8279. April 9, 1970. Russell L. Law, Washington, D.C., attorney of record, for appellant. Francis J. Pisarra, New York City, for appellee. Henderson, Pisarra Nolan, New York City, of counsel. Before RICH, Acting Chief Judge, ALMOND, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges, and FORD, Judge, United States Customs Court, sitting by designation. RICH, Acting Chief Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board sustaining an opposition, No. 44,674, brought

  6. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,617 times   276 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"