§

Cold Spring Granite Co.

101 N.L.R.B. 786 (N.L.R.B. 1952)
Cold Spring Granite Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. Kortz v. Guardian Life Ins. Co.

    144 F.2d 676 (10th Cir. 1944)   Cited 38 times
    Concluding that the judgment in the former action did not constitute either res judicata or estoppel because the question of disability during the time period of the present action had not been litigated and determined in the former action

  3. Stokely Foods v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    193 F.2d 736 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 12 times

    No. 13443. January 11, 1952. Frederic D. Anderson, Indianapolis, Ind., for petitioner. Marvin E. Frankel, Atty. NLRB, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel NLRB and A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel NLRB, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court on petition of Stokely Foods, Inc., to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board which directed petitioner to cease and desist

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys

  5. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Abbott Worsted Mills

    127 F.2d 438 (1st Cir. 1942)   Cited 14 times

    No. 3752. April 23, 1942. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order entered by the board against Abbott Worsted Mills, Inc. Decree enforcing order. William S. Gordon, Jr., of Boston, Mass. (Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Gerhard P. Van Arkel, and Thomas E. Shroyer, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. John P. Carleton, of Manchester, N.H. (McLane, Davis Carleton, of Manchester

  6. Sun Oil Co. v. Hoke

    169 P.2d 753 (Okla. 1946)   Cited 7 times
    In Hoke, the allegations were not briefed, whereas, in the case at bar, Husband has briefed some of his allegations of error.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. May Dept. Stores

    162 F.2d 247 (8th Cir. 1947)   Cited 4 times

    No. 13468. June 20, 1947. Rehearing Denied July 28, 1947. Petition for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of a cease and desist order against the May Department Stores Company, doing business as the Famous-Barr Company. Petition granted. Charles K. Hackler, Regional Atty., N.L.R.B., of Clayton, Mo. (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Morris P. Glushien, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Peerless Quarries

    193 F.2d 419 (10th Cir. 1951)

    No. 4303. December 31, 1951. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers and Ruth V. Russell, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo., (Clif Langsdale, Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for respondents. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. By this proceeding the National Labor Relations Board seeks the enforcement of its order of January 10, 1951, directed to the respondents,