§

Coca Cola Puerto Rico Bottlers

24-CA-011018 (N.L.R.B. Apr. 16, 2010)
Coca Cola Puerto Rico Bottlers

9 Cited authorities

  1. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,209 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  4. Romano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith

    487 U.S. 1205 (1988)   Cited 105 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding conclusion that employees classified as department managers did not meet executive exemption

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"

  7. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 27 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Gen. Truckdrivers, Warehousemen

    778 F.2d 207 (5th Cir. 1985)   Cited 9 times

    No. 85-4316. Summary Calendar. December 10, 1985. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner cross-respondent. Lewis Unglesby, Ossie Brown, Baton Rouge, La., for respondents cross-petitioners. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before POLITZ, GARWOOD and JOLLY, Circuit Judges. E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: This case is before the court upon application of the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) pursuant to section 10(e)

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Cast Optics Corporation

    458 F.2d 398 (3d Cir. 1972)   Cited 11 times

    No. 71-1098. Argued November 11, 1971. Decided March 23, 1972. Charles Steel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Samuel Gruber, Gruber Turkel, Stamford, Conn., for respondent. Joel Ronald Ax, Associate Gen. Counsel, New York City, for intervenor. Before VAN DUSEN and JAMES ROSEN, Circuit Judges, and BECKER, District Judge. OPINION OF THE COURT EDWARD R. BECKER,[fn*] District Judge. [fn*] Sitting by designation. I. This case is before the Court on the application of the National Labor Relations