§

Coca-Cola Bottling Works of Nashville

187 N.L.R.B. 102 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
Coca-Cola Bottling Works of Nashville

12 Cited authorities

  1. American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

    380 U.S. 300 (1965)   Cited 350 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

  2. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  3. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  4. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  5. United Pack., F. A. W. Int. U. v. N.L.R.B

    416 F.2d 1126 (D.C. Cir. 1969)   Cited 37 times

    Nos. 21627, 21825. Argued November 25, 1968. Decided February 7, 1969. Petitions for Rehearing Denied May 12, 1969. Certiorari Denied November 10, 1969. See 90 S.Ct. 216. Mr. Richard F. Watt, Chicago, Ill., with whom Messrs. Eugene Cotton, Chicago, Ill., and Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 21,627. Mr. Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., entered an appearance for intervenor in No. 21,825. Mr. John Edward Price, Fort Worth, Tex., for petitioner in

  6. Plasti-Line, Incorporated v. N.L.R.B

    278 F.2d 482 (6th Cir. 1960)   Cited 26 times

    No. 13958. May 27, 1960. M.W. Egerton, Sr., Knoxville, Tenn. (M.W. Egerton, Sr., Knoxville, Tenn., of counsel, Egerton, McAfee, Armistead Davis, Knoxville, Tenn., on brief), for petitioners. Norton J. Come, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Before O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and BOYD

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Frick Company

    397 F.2d 956 (3d Cir. 1968)   Cited 12 times
    In NLRB v. Frick Co., 397 F.2d 956 (3d Cir. 1968), the company's vacation plan provided that "[n]o vacation or vacation pay will be allowed or paid to any person who is not on the payroll of the Company on Wednesday preceding the week in which vacation pay is distributed."

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Aurora City Lines, Inc.

    299 F.2d 229 (7th Cir. 1962)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13465. February 2, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, A.I. Mendelsohn, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack and H.M. Levy, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Fred M. Petit, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and DUFFY and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (Board) has petitioned under section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick

    198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3 Cir. 1952), that court sustained a Board order requiring a respondent partnership which operated several enterprises engaged in the manufacture of ladies' garments to either reopen a plant which it had closed in violation of the Act because its employees had organized or give its employees an opportunity to work in other plants operated by the partnership.

  10. Art Metals Const. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    110 F.2d 148 (2d Cir. 1940)   Cited 38 times

    No. 163. February 26, 1940. On Petition to set aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Art Metals Construction Company, an employer, to set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, directing the employer to bargain collectively with a labor union and its employees, not to interfere with their right to organize, to put in writing any agreement it may reach with them, and to post the usual notices of compliance, wherein the Board requested an enforcement order