§

Coca-Cola Bottling Corp.

153 N.L.R.B. 1425 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Coca-Cola Bottling Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 881 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  2. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 959 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

  3. Black-Clawson Co. v. Int'l Ass'n of Mach

    313 F.2d 179 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 97 times
    Holding Section 301 is not restricted to suits for damages or specific enforcement and will sustain a request for a declaratory judgment

  4. N.L.R.B. v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc.

    297 F.2d 74 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 50 times
    In NLRB v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc., (5 Cir. 1961) 297 F.2d 74, 76, the necessity for granting a hearing on objections to an election was under consideration.

  5. Ostrofsky v. United Steelworkers of America

    171 F. Supp. 782 (D. Md. 1959)   Cited 50 times
    In Ostrofsky v. United Steelworkers of America, 171 F. Supp. 782 (D.C.Md. 1959), aff'd 273 F.2d 614 (4th Cir. 1960), where an employee sued his employer and union, the court, applying the reasoning in Jenkins v. Wm. Schluderberg — T. J. Kurdle Co., supra, held that an employee could not sue his employer unless the union acted arbitrarily or in a discriminatory manner and thereby breached its duty of fair representation.