§

Coast Engraving Co., Inc.

282 N.L.R.B. 1236 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Coast Engraving Co., Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  3. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

  4. Hinson v. N.L.R.B

    428 F.2d 133 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 81 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 302 "does not comprehend solely a collective bargaining agreement to the exclusion of any other possible written agreement"

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Herman Sausage Co

    275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 79 times
    In NLRB v. Herman Sausage Co., 275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960), our circuit held that "generally speaking, the freedom to grant a unilateral wage increase "is limited to cases where there has been a bona fide but unsuccessful attempt to reach an agreement with the union, or where the union bears the guilt for having broken off relations.' NLRB v. Andrew Jergens Co., 9 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 130, 136, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 827, 70 S.Ct. 76, 94 L.Ed. 503.

  7. United Steelworkers of Am., v. N.L.R.B

    401 F.2d 434 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 17 times

    Nos. 21193, 21343. Argued April 8, 1968. Decided September 3, 1968. Mr. George H. Cohen, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Elliot Bredhoff and Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 21,193 and intervenor in No. 21,343. Mr. Glenn L. Greene, Jr., with whom Mr. W. Reynolds Allen, Goldsboro, N.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 21,343 and intervenor in No. 21,193. Mr. Elliott Moore, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman

  8. Globe Cotton Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    103 F.2d 91 (5th Cir. 1939)   Cited 39 times
    In Globe Cotton Mills v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 103 F.2d 91, 94, the court said: "there is a duty on both sides * * * to enter into discussion with an open and fair mind, and a sincere purpose to find a basis of agreement touching wages and hours and conditions of labor, and if found to embody it in a contract as specific as possible, which shall stand as a mutual guaranty of conduct, and as a guide for the adjustment of grievances."

  9. Majure v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    198 F.2d 735 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 21 times

    No. 13762. July 18, 1952. E.L. Snow, J.A. Covington, Jr., Meridian, Miss., for petitioner. John F. Preston, Jr., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, D.P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., National Labor Relations Board. Before HOLMES, RUSSELL and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RUSSELL, Circuit Judge. L.L. Majure and Mrs. Jo M. Majure, trading as Majure Transport Company, which will be referred to herein as the company, or employer, petition this Court to review and set aside an order