Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

Lunney, an Infant v. Prodigy Services Co.

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. FES

Holding issue not exhausted where the "tenor" of petitioner's objection to the Board was "purely factual," but the tenor of the objection on appeal was legal

N.L.R.B. v. Calkins

Recognizing that Nevada law does not extend special protection to free speech interests at the expense of a private store owner's property interest

Multi-Ad Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Affirming Board's finding of coercive interrogation where an employee was asked "why he would want to bring a union into the company"

Fivecap, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Holding that circulating a petition constituted concerted activity

Bourne v. N.L.R.B

In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

Contractors' Labor Pool, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Concluding that the word "inherently" precludes reliance on "independent variables"