§

Club Monte Carlo Corp.

280 N.L.R.B. 257 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Club Monte Carlo Corp.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Peter Cailler Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co.

    130 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1942)   Cited 69 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Peter Cailler Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co., 130 F.2d 503 (2d Cir. 1942), Judge Learned Hand stated his view of the type of activity protected by section 7.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Solo Cup Company

    237 F.2d 521 (8th Cir. 1956)   Cited 40 times

    No. 15524. October 18, 1956. Rehearing Denied November 16, 1956. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. John J. Hasburgh, Kansas City, Mo. (Carl E. Enggas and Watson S. Marshall Enggas, Kansas City, Mo., were with him on the brief), for respondent. Before WOODROUGH

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Wonder State Manufacturing Company

    344 F.2d 210 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 28 times
    Finding award of one week's pay to be a gift and not subject to mandatory bargaining

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Plastilite Corporation

    375 F.2d 343 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 18 times

    No. 18443. March 30, 1967. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Burton L. Raimi, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief with her. John E. Tate, of Nelson, Harding, Acklie, Leonard Tate, Lincoln, Neb., for respondent. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, GIBSON and HEANEY, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. This case is

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McCaffrey

    619 F.2d 620 (6th Cir. 1980)

    No. 78-1068. April 23, 1980. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Emil Farkas, Director, Region 9, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Arnold Morelli, Bauer, Morelli Heyd, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent. Before ENGEL and JONES, Circuit Judges, and CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge. ORDER Petitioner, The National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") seeks enforcement of its Order, reported at 223 NLRB No. 184, that the ABC Concrete Company (the "Company") violated