Clinton Electronics Corp.

42 Cited authorities

Teamsters v. United States
431 U.S. 324 (1977) Cited 4,648 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding that a plaintiff who did not apply for a position can still make prima facie showing if he can demonstrate his application for the position would have been futile
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.
462 U.S. 393 (1983) Cited 652 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
467 U.S. 867 (1984) Cited 584 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that resolution of a class action pertaining to whether employer engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination did not preclude claims that employer discriminated against individual employees
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.
394 U.S. 759 (1969) Cited 809 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication
First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
452 U.S. 666 (1981) Cited 269 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons
Brooks v. Labor Board
348 U.S. 96 (1954) Cited 300 times
Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Partington v. Broyhill Furniture Industries
999 F.2d 269 (7th Cir. 1993) Cited 87 times
Affirming denial of judgment notwithstanding the verdict
Carry Companies of Illinois, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
30 F.3d 922 (7th Cir. 1994) Cited 34 times
Acknowledging that, "where an employer establishes a regular pattern of overlooking certain violations of company policy, the employer may not later rely on such violations to satisfy its burden under Wright Line."

Clinton Electronics Corp.

42 Cited authorities

Holding that a plaintiff who did not apply for a position can still make prima facie showing if he can demonstrate his application for the position would have been futile

Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Holding that resolution of a class action pertaining to whether employer engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination did not preclude claims that employer discriminated against individual employees

Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication

Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Affirming denial of judgment notwithstanding the verdict

Acknowledging that, "where an employer establishes a regular pattern of overlooking certain violations of company policy, the employer may not later rely on such violations to satisfy its burden under Wright Line."